Monday, 28 April 2014

A Handy Design Guide for New Twitter Profiles


In 2011 I wrote about the “New New Twitter” which placed a larger emphasis on the overall experience from a user’s home feed to the profile. That change was focused a lot more on driving more communication and engagement, while also introducing enhanced image cards.
This month Twitter rolled out a new design for users around the world placing significantly more emphasis on content consumption and discovery by visiting other’s profiles, instead of just consumption from the home feed.
In addition to the obvious facelift of the profile, new options allow users to see another person’s feed through multiple display options: tweets only, tweets containing just photos/videos (or photo collages), or all tweets and replies. Even individual tweets become larger or smaller depending on how many people have engaged with it.
From the Twitter blog:
The new web profile lets you use a larger profile photo, customize your header, show off your best Tweets and more. Here are main features:
  • Best Tweets: Tweets that have received more engagement will appear slightly larger, so your best content is easy to find.
  • Pinned Tweet: Pin one of your Tweets to the top of your page, so it’s easy for your followers to see what you’re all about.
  • Filtered Tweets: Now you can choose which timeline to view when checking out other profiles. Select from these options: Tweets, Tweets with photos/videos, or Tweets and replies.
While we’re still in the early stages of the rollout, all brands should be prepared to make some changes to optimize their profile for the change. Fortunately, the folks over atMcBeard, an online creative agency out of LA, created this handy design guide to help illustrate the new changes.
If you’re looking for a photoshop template to work out of, Re/Code‘s community manager Anthony Quintano also created a quick and easy PSD file that he has been using with success. You can download it here.



Friday, 25 April 2014

Google+ Is Walking Dead


Today, Google’s Vic Gundotra announced that he would be leaving the company after eight years. The first obvious question is where this leaves Google+, Gundotra’s baby and primary project for the past several of those years.
What we’re hearing from multiple sources is that Google+ will no longer be considered a product, but a platform — essentially ending its competition with other social networks like Facebook and Twitter.
A Google representative has vehemently denied these claims. “Today’s news has no impact on our Google+ strategy — we have an incredibly talented team that will continue to build great user experiences across Google+, Hangouts and Photos.”
According to two sources, Google has apparently been reshuffling the teams that used to form the core of Google+, a group numbering between 1,000 and 1,200 employees. We hear that there’s a new building on campus, so many of those people are getting moved physically, as well — not necessarily due to Gundotra’s departure.
As part of these staff changes, the Google Hangouts team will be moving to the Android team, and it’s likely that the photos team will follow, these people said. Basically, talent will be shifting away from the Google+ kingdom and towards Android as a platform, we’re hearing.
We’ve heard Google has not yet decided what to do with the teams not going to Android, and that Google+ is not “officially” dead, more like walking dead: “When you fire the top dog and take away all resources it is what it is.” It will take copious amounts of work for it to un-zombie, if that’s even a possibility.
It’s not clear, according to our sources’ intel, where the rest of the employees will go, but the assumption is that Larry Page will follow Mark Zuckerberg’s lead at Facebook and send the bulk of them to mobile roles.
This would telegraph a major acceleration of mobile efforts in general, rather than G+. The teams will apparently be building “widgets,” which take advantage of Google+ as a platform, rather than a focus on G+ as its own integral product.
One big change for Google+ is that there will no longer be a policy of “required” Google+ integrations for Google products, something that has become de rigueur for most product updates.
One impetus of this was that the YouTube integration with Google+ did not go well, something that the public recognized through the comments blowback, but that was also seen inside the company as a rocky move.
That doesn’t mean that all G+ integrations will go away, though. Gmail will continue to have it, but there may be some scaling back that keeps the “sign-on” aspects without the heavy-handed pasting over of G+.
We’ve heard that there were tensions between Gundotra and others inside the company, especially surrounding the “forced” integrations of Google+ into products like YouTube and Gmail. Apparently, once each of those integrations was made, they were initially being claimed as “active user” wins until Page stepped in and made a distinction.
Taking Gundotra’s place inside Google will be David Besbris, though we hear that parts of Google+ are under “the person responsible for Chrome,” according to one source. It’s not clear if this is Sundar Pichai, Google’s head of Chrome and Android, or why this would happen. “It’s complicated,” our source said. Google PR denies this account.
We’ve heard that the acquisition of WhatsApp by Facebook may have been a factor in the phasing out of Gundotra’s grand experiment. There was a perception that Google had missed the “biggest acquisition in the social space.” Though another source tells us that Google knew what was up with WhatsApp but simply didn’t want to pay out for it.
Google+ is and always has been about turning every Google user into a signed-in Google user, period. If true, these changes dovetail with that focus going forward, with Google+ acting as a backbone rather than a front-end service. That being said, there are a ton of really interesting things going on in Google+ like its efforts in imaging. Having the photos team integrate the technologies backing Google+ photos tightly into the Android camera product, for instance, could be a net win for Android users.
In the long run, the issues with Google+ didn’t especially stem from the design of the product itself, but more from the way it interjected itself into your day-to-day Google experience like some unwelcome hairy spider. Perhaps these changes will scale back the grating party crashing?

Don’t Humiliate Yourself on Social Networking Sites

How active are you on social networking sites? Almost three in four online adults are actively using social networking sites. With 90 percent involved, the 18-29 crowd is most heavily involved in social media. With 1.26 billion users, Facebook is the most popular of these sites. Its main purpose is connecting friends and family together. It’s also an outlet for people to share pictures, videos, music and stories. Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube and Snapchat are all extremely popular as well. They all tend to serve different purposes.
As best practice, you should always be careful with your personal identity. Never share private information with anyone on social sites. Be sure to act your age and avoid trying to act so cool. Be selective with what you post as well. The world doesn’t necessarily care where you check in every single day. You should ask before you tag—not everyone wants to be associated with embarrassing stories or photos.
To make sure you’re maximizing social, check into some classes or online courses, make a checklist of what you want to accomplish with your social presence and even consider asking your kids for advice.
Do you actively use social networking sites? Which one is your favorite? Does other people’s lack of etiquette ever bother you? Please share in the comments, and take a look at the infographic for more helpful information!
Social Media Etiquette